Would Real Life Alchemy Be Profitable?
September 4, 2012 in Editorial
Money may not grow on trees, but to the medieval it could be made through dark sorcery. Henry IV of England banned alchemy, Pope John XII forbade the ‘lies’ of transmutation, and Dante found a special place in hell for the alchemist.
For those who are unaware, we are talking about the mythological turning of a common metal into one of more value.
If it did actually work, of course, then an alchemist could make themself incredibly wealthy very quickly. Alchemy is typically considered to be the transmutation of lead into gold. Taking some current prices of these two metals, the profit on one ounce’s conversion from lead to gold is $1588.13.
Now if you ask a chemist’s opinion, they will tell you that because lead is a bigger atom than gold, you’ll get some lithium made as well as a by-product. Just so you know.
Lead → Gold + Lithium
It looks like the creation of just a few ounces of gold could keep someone comfortable for quite a long time. And conversion of a kilogram of lead would mean a staggering profit of $44,994,291.03
Which is all well and good, so long as no-one knows that there is an alchemist.
Because the high price of gold comes from its being a rare earth metal. It is uncommon, hence the cost. Like platinum or silver, its value is in being hard to find.
But there used to be another precious metal.
Prior to 1886, aluminium was one of the world’s most expensive metals, more so than gold. This was due to the extremely expensive and time consuming process of removing aluminium from its ore. Then, in 1886, the Hall-Heroult process meant that aluminium was suddenly very cheap to produce. The price plummeted. Aluminium is still valuable as it is used in manufacture, but costs far less than it used to.
So what if alchemy was discovered, and everyone knew that gold was easy to produce? Then surely the price of gold would plummet, like aluminium’s did. Gold would still be useful in manufacture, as aluminium is, but after alchemy neither would be valuable as rare metals.
If alchemy became widespread, then let’s assume that the price of gold would become similar to that of aluminium. Would turning lead into gold still be profitable if gold had the same market value as aluminium?
Well, not really. Lead and aluminium actually have very similar prices, so alchemy would only be a bit profitable sometimes as the market values of the metals fluctuated.
At the time of writing, conversion of lead to gold (at aluminium price) would lead to a small loss; less than a cent per ounce, but a loss nonetheless.
Except, remember the lithium?
Lead → Gold + Lithium
Lithium is used in chemical laboratories, and if it’s pure, is actually reasonably expensive, at $4.39 per gram. From the transmutation of ten ounces of lead, this would mean $42.10 worth of lithium would be produced. Quite a tidy profit.
So if alchemy was well known then it could make a small profit and help further modern science. If alchemy is not well known, then it can make a huge profit for the individual.
In numbers? Profit for transmutation of one ounce of lead is $1588.13 if done in secret, or $4.21 if the knowledge of alchemy becomes known.
So don’t ever expect to hear about someone’s alchemy in the news.
N.B. If anyone is interested in the chemistry, or rather chemical assumptions and workings out involved in this article, please email me at sean.goodwin@centives.net.
Enjoyed this article? Perhaps check out our coverage of The Batman over here, or find out just how plausible a steam punk airship is. You can find this and other articles in our Editorials although for a selection of the best check out our Greatest Hits. And be sure to stay in touch:
Let us play a game it is called make the daily post let us assume that this is wwone of the journals that you are posting your daily link on what would the summery be?
– Turning gold into lead can be profitable
– Unless everybody knows you can make it then nobody would pay you
Look at it It’s stupid and you would never post something like that your links have remained of a high quality your long form articles have not what happened?
If you’re going to publish bad things at least make it short and stop wasting my time in those two points i’ve summarized the entire article why not just shorted to that instead of writing so much
Your other articles were concise this one was not it was long and boring and dallied and it made no point in a lot of words and i don’t know why your just talking for the sake of talking
you should not write this stuff and if you will then pls make shorter
Madam, you might want to go back to (or simply go to) high school for learning how to read and summarize articles…
well of course it would be profitable not to realize that
Just some advice
Infrequent articles which are good
Are better than frequent articles that are bad
A few moree articles like the last two
And the unsubscribe button
At the bottom of all your emails
Will begin to look
Very appealing
This would be a shame
There were no articles after batman
Maybv that’s why you felt pressured
to publish things quickly
but these have just been bad
Please stop
Your true fans dont mind waiting
Until you have something
Good to write
#expected-better-from-you
I know the guy who started Centives, we were in the same class once. I didn’t talk to him much but I overheard him a lot, he’s really proud of this website he wouldn’t let something like this get published.
His problem though is that he’s nice, way too nice for his own good. Have you seen the last two articles? They weren’t published by Centives. They all had to do with this Sean Goodwin guy. That’s never happened in like my year of reading. Do you know where he’s from? My guess is he’s some big shot writer at some other website. He agreed to write for this website but only if they published that it was HIM writing it, because he needs to feed his ego, and he doesn’t let anybody review his crap before he publishes.
MESSAGE TO EDITORS, FIRE THIS GUY YOU DON’T NEED HIM. SEND HIM BACK TO WHATEVER WEBSITE HE USED TO WRITE FOR. HE’S JUST ARROGANT. HE MIGHT HAVE CONVINCED YOU THAT HE’S NOT A GOOD WRITER BUT HE’S NOT. AND IF YOUR CONTRACT DOESN’T LET YOU FIRE HIM THEN AT LEAST READ WHAT HE WRITES BEOFRE YOU LET HIM PUBLISH. YOU DON’T HAVE TO BE NICE TO HIM HE’S ABUSING YOUR GENEROSITY.
This is so fucking stupid. You’re saying that alchemy would be profitable? Well duh.
What’s tomorrows editorial going to be? That more cars on the road would cause traffic?
Fuck this, you guys used to be interesting.